Mi sto arrovellando il cervello per capire quali siano gli anelli difettosi nel processo di tutela di “salute e sicurezza”.
· Tra le mie antiche convinzioni ben radicate vi è una carenza (credo e spero per difetto di risorse) di sorveglianza sia sul piano quantitativo che su quello qualitativo.
· Il regime sanzionatorio non è efficace se non arricchito da una strenua lotta alla ignoranza che si dovrebbe sviluppare a tutti i livelli tra gli attori della sicurezza, lavoratori compresi.
· Le valutazioni del rischio con cui mi confronto sono in molti casi delle “commedie dell’arte” che su un canovaccio adattano i dati di identificazione dell’azienda. Non c’è pensiero critico, talora in buona fede, talora in evidente malafede.
· L’RSPP è un ruolo formale.
· L’RLS non ha supporti né da parte dei lavoratori né dall’Azienda.
· Il MC ha responsabilità ma non potere.
· Il DDL pensa alla produzione e all’economia. Delega, spesso senza sapere cosa e attende un prodotto che non è in grado di giudicare e ritiene valido solo in quanto ha un corrispettivo economico, un costo.
· Molti Consulenti sono inadeguati o impreparati.
Questa in sintesi molto elementare la mia analisi dello stato dell’arte.
Voi come vedete le cose dal vostro osservatorio? Credete che, al di là della buona volontà e dell’impegno individuale ci siano possibili vie verso una trasformazione dell’esubero teorico in una prassi efficace?
Ora qualcuno si arrabbierà vedendo che inserisco un testo in lingua inglese. Me ne scuso.
Vi riporto quanto scrive l'HSE (health & safety executive) del Regno Unito come proprio manifesto programmatico per la difficile attività di prevenzione di salute e sicurezza nei luoghi di lavoro: (link: http://www.hse.gov.uk/strategy/strategy09.pdf )
Traggo dal sito della HSE: “Our job is to prevent death, injury and ill health to those at work and those affected by work activities.”
When the new Board of HSE formed in April 2008 we decided to take the lead in developing a new strategy, which would build on the many strengths of what we already have, but would also recognise the many changes that continue to take place around us and which present new challenges for the health and safety system as a whole. The consultation process has evinced widespread support for our approach from all stakeholders and has enabled us to fine-tune the strategy to take account of the views expressed.
There is collective agreement that:
We need renewed momentum to improve health and safety performance.
We need to respond to a wide range of risks – from more small businesses, from new sectors and new technologies, as well as traditional industries and long-standing risks.
We need to find new ways of engaging workforces in all workplaces of all shapes and sizes, using the knowledge we have gained from the past that properly involved unionised safety representatives achieved better health and safety performance.
We need leaders who are committed to promulgating a common-sense, practical approach to health and safety in their own organisations and throughout the supply chains they work with, motivated by the real business benefits, not exemption from regulatory scrutiny.
We need to regain the value of the brand for what is real health and safety and challenge its devaluation as a synonym for unnecessary bureaucracy and an excuse for not doing things.
The strong co-regulator partnership between HSE and local authorities is integral to this strategy and to its delivery – but regulators cannot do it alone. We need everyone to play their part in delivering improved higher standards of performance in health and safety because it is delivery of this strategy that will count.
We will measure and report our progress, but we should be clear that we will be measuring the success of our collective efforts not just the role of the regulator.
You have told us that you support our approach, now let us work together to make this a truly shared mission and to realise the many benefits. Prevention of pain and suffering to people caused by work is the major driver for us all, but doing the right things the right way also delivers improved productivity, increased workforce commitment and enhanced reputation. In a world that is continually changing around us, the need for us all to work together to make this happen is constant.
The Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 established the simple yet enduring principle that those who create risk are best placed to manage it. The Act led to the setting up of the Health and Safety Commission
(HSC) and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and established HSE and local authorities as joint enforcers of health and safety law.
This document presents the Board’s strategy for the health and safety system as a whole. It recognises and addresses the many stakeholders who have a role in maintaining or improving health and safety standards.
Those stakeholders include:
employers and their representative bodies;
the self-employed;
workers and their representative bodies;
HSE;
local authorities;
Government, through its departments and agencies etc;
the devolved administrations and their agencies etc;
professional bodies;
voluntary and third sector organisations.
To be truly effective, health and safety has to be an everyday process supported by all as an integral part of workplace culture.
Con ulteriori scuse per il testo in inglese
TCam
Medici indolenti & Aziende Netgroup
https://www.facebook.com/retemedicicompetenti/
tcam il 16/09/2009 01:41 ha scritto:
Mi sto arrovellando il cervello per capire quali siano gli anelli difettosi nel processo di tutela di “salute e sicurezza”.
· Tra le mie antiche convinzioni ben radicate vi è una carenza (credo e spero per difetto di risorse) di sorveglianza sia sul piano quantitativo che su quello qualitativo.
· Il regime sanzionatorio non è efficace se non arricchito da una strenua lotta alla ignoranza che si dovrebbe sviluppare a tutti i livelli tra gli attori della sicurezza, lavoratori compresi.
· Le valutazioni del rischio con cui mi confronto sono in molti casi delle “commedie dell’arte” che su un canovaccio adattano i dati di identificazione dell’azienda. Non c’è pensiero critico, talora in buona fede, talora in evidente malafede.
· L’RSPP è un ruolo formale.
· L’RLS non ha supporti né da parte dei lavoratori né dall’Azienda.
· Il MC ha responsabilità ma non potere.
· Il DDL pensa alla produzione e all’economia. Delega, spesso senza sapere cosa e attende un prodotto che non è in grado di giudicare e ritiene valido solo in quanto ha un corrispettivo economico, un costo.
· Molti Consulenti sono inadeguati o impreparati.
Questa in sintesi molto elementare la mia analisi dello stato dell’arte.
Voi come vedete le cose dal vostro osservatorio? Credete che, al di là della buona volontà e dell’impegno individuale ci siano possibili vie verso una trasformazione dell’esubero teorico in una prassi efficace?
Ora qualcuno si arrabbierà vedendo che inserisco un testo in lingua inglese. Me ne scuso.
Vi riporto quanto scrive l'HSE (health & safety executive) del Regno Unito come proprio manifesto programmatico per la difficile attività di prevenzione di salute e sicurezza nei luoghi di lavoro: (link: http://www.hse.gov.uk/strategy/strategy09.pdf )
Traggo dal sito della HSE: “Our job is to prevent death, injury and ill health to those at work and those affected by work activities.”
When the new Board of HSE formed in April 2008 we decided to take the lead in developing a new strategy, which would build on the many strengths of what we already have, but would also recognise the many changes that continue to take place around us and which present new challenges for the health and safety system as a whole. The consultation process has evinced widespread support for our approach from all stakeholders and has enabled us to fine-tune the strategy to take account of the views expressed.
There is collective agreement that:
We need renewed momentum to improve health and safety performance.
We need to respond to a wide range of risks – from more small businesses, from new sectors and new technologies, as well as traditional industries and long-standing risks.
We need to find new ways of engaging workforces in all workplaces of all shapes and sizes, using the knowledge we have gained from the past that properly involved unionised safety representatives achieved better health and safety performance.
We need leaders who are committed to promulgating a common-sense, practical approach to health and safety in their own organisations and throughout the supply chains they work with, motivated by the real business benefits, not exemption from regulatory scrutiny.
We need to regain the value of the brand for what is real health and safety and challenge its devaluation as a synonym for unnecessary bureaucracy and an excuse for not doing things.
The strong co-regulator partnership between HSE and local authorities is integral to this strategy and to its delivery – but regulators cannot do it alone. We need everyone to play their part in delivering improved higher standards of performance in health and safety because it is delivery of this strategy that will count.
We will measure and report our progress, but we should be clear that we will be measuring the success of our collective efforts not just the role of the regulator.
You have told us that you support our approach, now let us work together to make this a truly shared mission and to realise the many benefits. Prevention of pain and suffering to people caused by work is the major driver for us all, but doing the right things the right way also delivers improved productivity, increased workforce commitment and enhanced reputation. In a world that is continually changing around us, the need for us all to work together to make this happen is constant.
The Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 established the simple yet enduring principle that those who create risk are best placed to manage it. The Act led to the setting up of the Health and Safety Commission
(HSC) and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and established HSE and local authorities as joint enforcers of health and safety law.
This document presents the Board’s strategy for the health and safety system as a whole. It recognises and addresses the many stakeholders who have a role in maintaining or improving health and safety standards.
Those stakeholders include:
employers and their representative bodies;
the self-employed;
workers and their representative bodies;
HSE;
local authorities;
Government, through its departments and agencies etc;
the devolved administrations and their agencies etc;
professional bodies;
voluntary and third sector organisations.
To be truly effective, health and safety has to be an everyday process supported by all as an integral part of workplace culture.
Con ulteriori scuse per il testo in inglese
TCam
Condivido gran parte di quello che hai scritto.
Soprattutto riguardo ai DVR che, soprattutto quelli compilati dai centri di medicina del lavoro per le piccole imprese, spesso non sono altro che un vergognoso copia e incolla; un modo becero di fare soldi solo per produrre carta.
Argeo Maviglia
MedicoCompetente.it - Copyright 2001-2024 Tutti i diritti riservati - Partita IVA IT01138680507
Privacy | Contatti